In its quest to maintain transparency and institutional integrity in the appointment of key functionaries in sensitive organisations, Common Cause filed a .Read More+
W. P. (C) No. 505/2015 tagged with W P (C) No. 683/2014
Challenging the vires of the appointments made to the CVC
Common Cause along with a few renowned and concerned citizens have filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the arbitrary appointments of India’s new Central Vigilance Commissioner and the Vigilance Commissioner. It is argued that a complete non-transparency was followed by the Central Government in making the said appointments and that these were illegal and void as they violated the principles of ‘impeccable integrity’ and ‘institutional integrity’ laid down in the landmark judgments of the Apex Court in Vineet Narain case (1998) and Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) case (2011). Notice has been issued in the petition. Common Cause filed an IA praying that the UOI may be directed to not make any appointments which required the participation of either the CVC or the VC, since their appointment itself had been challenged by CC. There are no further orders of listing.
The IA filed by Common Cause in November 2016, praying for directions for constitution of a Special Investigation Team to thoroughly investigate the evidence gathered in the raids on the Aditya Birla and the Sahara groups was dismissed on January 11, 2017 by the Court on account of lack of evidentiary value, being irrelevant and legally inadmissible. On February 10, 2017, the counsel for the Union of India brought the entire original record to defend the appointment of the CVC and the VC. However, the court said that the records would be seen later. The matter is likely to be listed in first week of April.